Opposite sides of the Law: Rights Vs Privileges


Did you know... that there are opposite sides of the law? There is 'general society side' which is the one you are in all probability working in which subjects you to government commands, unremitting directions, fines, charges, punishments, imprison and even demise.

'The Private Side' is accessible to everybody and gives a departure from 'open law'. In any case, no one will discuss it since it's considered a 'danger' to the 'framework'. The mafia doesn't care for rivalry you know!

Alright here's a little goody for you to consider... A 'permit' or 'allow' is a constrained authorization to do what is generally illicit.

Question #1... at the point when did it move toward becoming 'illicit' to get hitched? Don't you require a 'permit'?

Question #2... at the point when did it wind up illicit to repair your own home? Don't you require an 'allow'?

... also, for what reason to I have to pay another person for their consent to deal with my own particular issues and my own property?

We (Americans) don't get rights 'from' the constitution as such a large number of individuals erroneously say. The constitution was made to 'ensure' our normally enriched natural rights and to tie down the hands of insidious men in influence with the goal that they couldn't encroach upon those rights that are gave to us by God.

So the last inquiry of the day is: "So then for what reason are our open workers and chose agents disregarding those constraints and making common conflict against the general population (their lords) with steady provocation and police controls?" The appropriate response is as clear as highly contrasting and you will be shocked. It's not 'them' that are in blunder. It's you!

Give me a chance to set up the situation so we can comprehend this somewhat better. Suppose I have a little private island amidst the sea and I need to work together. Be that as it may, there are no clients. I see a journey transport passing by consistently. I need those individuals to be my clients, and not only for a 'day visit', but rather for eternity. In this way, to get the men intrigued, I offer a lot of charming island young ladies and free lager. To get the ladies intrigued, I offer free spa and magnificence medications and boundless free shoes of various sorts!

So word gets out and the journey customers request that the ship stop en route which it before long does to prop their voyage business up and their clients cheerful. As individuals enter the island we have migration checkpoint obviously. To get on the island, I have everybody sign an agreement which essentially says that they surrender every common comfortable shoreline, and on the island they should maintain every single business direction on the island. Also, when the general population leave the island, the terms of the agreement say that 'the individual' must comply with similar guidelines consequently, wherever they go.

Presently, obviously law doesn't regularly work along these lines as there are jurisdictional issues. To get around this, I know I can't control John Smith when he goes home to Kentucky. Thus, I'll get John Smith to concede that he is JOHN SMITH, which by activity of law is another 'lawful individual'. What's more, as long as John Smith, believes he's JOHN SMITH, he'll need to send me cash at whatever point I send JOHN SMITH a bill since it's in the agreement and he consented to it.

The general population couldn't care less, and they don't see in any case at first. They simply need island young ladies, free lager and free shoes! They say 'better believe it, no doubt, whatever... ' and sign the agreement to get on the island to get their advantages. Realizing that 'no law can repeal the privileges of agreement', I'm feeling quite great that I'm getting shiploads of new clients consistently who are focusing on me forever, by contract.

My expenses, charges and different business I take in more than pays for the brew and shoes I give away and now with this plan of action, I can indicate financial specialists a constant flow of approaching new clients. With my bookkeeping books and income I would now be able to acquire tremendous measures of cash to manufacture my realm, uphold my agreements, and develop, develop! My little island business is a HUGE achievement!

So at that point, as a general rule, my little 'island business' is just 10 miles square in territory and encompassed by Virginia and Maryland. That's right, the UNITED STATES government, which isn't to be mistaken for the republic of the unified 'Conditions of America'. It's spelled along these lines with little 'u' in light of the fact that the word 'joined together' here is utilized as a 'descriptor', not part of the name. It depicts the thing which is the legislative unit for the 'Conditions of America', which are incomparable on the 'Private Side' of the law.

This is a not all that little and imperative qualification. The 'republic' is the by law, or 'legal' government where the private side of the law i.e. your undeniable rights and protected constraints on government, are operational.

The UNITED STATES is a corporate element represented by corporate ordinances i.e. enactment for its corporate individuals and each one of the individuals who volunteer into its ward by method for contract!

In the days of yore of the republic, when babies were conceived, the perpetual record of birth was made in the family book of scriptures, the name recorded as John Smith, and it was seen by those present for confirmation. Under the new framework, individuals apply for the BIRTH CERTIFICATE which makes our lawful, juristic individual: JOHN SMITH instead of John Smith and quickly, as a child there are two individuals conceived. The no nonsense individual, and the invented 'trust' substance (legitimate individual) which will serve 'my island business'.

Presently, since 1933, when House Joint Resolution 192 expelled 'legitimate cash' from flow and there was no more cash to 'pay' for things (i.e. gold and silver) a radical new framework developed. Around then, the medium of trade moved toward becoming 'credit' or 'guarantees to pay' (i.e. Central bank Note). All we get are 'guarantees to pay' which never get paid (at law) thus by task of law, this 'advantage' which is the benefit of 'releasing' the risk of an obligation (not really paying for it by law) brings us under the domain of 'the laws of trade' in everything that we do. Trade obviously is directed. THE UNITED STATES at that point makes everything a 'business movement' for JOHN SMITH which enables it to direct JOHN SMITH from support to grave and JOHN SMITH pays expenses, enrollments, fines, assesses and causes potential criminal punishments on the off chance that he doesn't take after the corporate by laws i.e. Government regs.

So now would you say you are beginning to see the lines of qualification between the 'Private' side of the law and 'People in general' side?

Thus currently how about we return to the advantages. They let us know, "You require the birth endorsement so as to enlist your tyke in school, and to land a position, and to select in Social security, and, and, and... " Before you know it, you have such a large number of 'grip contracts' (non-debatable) with the island business, you are totally wrapped up and can never guarantee your natural right's since they are superseded by your 'deliberate understanding' when you connected for benefits and went into 'contract' with THE UNITED STATES.

This is the reason 'the constitution' never again applies to the vast majority. Much the same as Esau surrendered his legacy for a bowl of porridge in the book of Genesis, the majority of us have done likewise. About all courts in the UNITED STATES are courts of 'Office of the chief naval officer' locale. They are managerial councils directing the insolvency of THE UNITED STATES (bankrupt since they evacuated the 'legitimate cash' in HJR 192). The courts are there just to control the agreement under insolvency laws. They are NOT there to ensure your rights. They have no ward or expert over that. It isn't so much that the judge is 'awful', he or she is just after the guidelines of the court in Admiralty. So on the off chance that you request protected rights in an agreement court of Admiralty, at that point 'you' are the person who is out of request!

We've just touched the most superficial layer regarding this matter yet I trust I've stood out enough to be noticed. Everybody ought to comprehend this and what the cures are. Requesting rights and placing trust in the political procedure are habit and a total exercise in futility (on the national level) until the point that you and your sheriff comprehend the task of law and whether you are on the PUBLIC SIDE or the Private side.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maritime Lawyers For Your Case

Have You Recently Filed An Accident At Work Claim?

Are You Due Unpaid Overtime Wages?