Psychological militants Plan and Attack Soft Targets, What Do You Call It When Organized Unions Do That?
With regards to harming our economy precisely who is more regrettable, International Terrorists of Large Unions? The reason I ask is straightforward, you see we are in a Presidential Election year, with under 100-days to go, and the two hopefuls are looking at redistributing American Jobs and discussing why organizations are leaving the US and looking for less antagonistic business situations; bring down corporate expenses, few legal claims, more straightforward directions, and less sorrow from associations. Affirm so how about we discuss who is truly harming our economy will we?
There was a fascinating article that showed up in News and World Report on September 7, 2015 titled: "With contract termination nearing, UAW boss says he hasn't picked an auto organization to focus," by Tom Krisher, Associated Press Auto Writer - which expressed:
"... UAW President Dennis Williams said Monday he'll pick between Ford, General Motors and Fiat Chrysler," and "Talking after Detroit's yearly Labor Day march, Williams didn't address whether the agreements would be broadened and gave no insights about how the discussions that cover around 140,000 specialists are advancing; 'Everyone says to me 'Dennis, have you picked an objective?' Yes. General Motors, Ford and Chrysler,' Williams said to acclaim amid a post-march discourse. Yet, a while later he told correspondents that he would pick a solitary organization when the present four-year contracts end."
At the season of that article around one-year prior - The UAW (United Auto Workers) president expressed he hasn't chosen, or THEY haven't chosen which auto organization to TARGET yet. Goodness, some other division in our economy and they'd confront a Federal Indictment for scheming along these lines. I am irritated with the twofold guidelines we have in this Great Nation. It's unfortunate to enable the UAW to do this. Absolutely woeful, Ayn Rand was correct. Is this extremely about aggregate dealing or is this about aggregate threatening.
Also, what occurs if organizations don't submit? Straightforward, the association individuals will act like hooligans, vandalize autos of "scabs" those specialists who cross the picket lines, and badger administration, low maintenance laborers and hall to inspire government to come in and over control and fine the organizations into depletion until the point that they surrender and pay up. Stunning, so what is the meaning of fear based oppression once more?
"The utilization of viciousness and terrorizing in the quest for political points."
That's right, that is the definition and it beyond any doubt fits these activities isn't that right? Things being what they are, if the democrats support huge worker's guilds, does that mean they are supporting fear mongering? Well? Isn't that right?